I want to close this series with the article I have been carrying inside me for years.
Not about certificates. Not about personal growth. About all of us who practise NLP in Greece, and about a question I believe our generation of practitioners will be called to answer.
The landscape as it is
Look at NLP in Greece today, honestly and without bitterness, and you will see islands.
My own path ran partly through INLPTA, a tradition I am proud of and still represent. Colleagues I deeply respect trained through ABNLP. Others through the Society of NLP, IANLP, or independent schools with their own traditions. I have passed through several of these islands as a trainee, and each island has its trainers, its terminology, its community and its loyalties.
And I want to say clearly what I believe about this: the diversity itself is healthy. Different schools preserve different emphases. Some hold the therapeutic depth, some the business applications, some the rigour of modelling, some the creative edge. A field with only one orthodoxy would be poorer. I have learned from all of these traditions, and I would erase none of them.
But islands have a cost. We all know it, even when we don’t say it.
When a psychologist asks me “is NLP a serious field?”, which island answers? When a company evaluates a practitioner, against which standard? When a client is harmed by someone untrained and bound by no code of ethics, who answers for it? When research appears that could strengthen all of us, through which channel does it reach us?
Nobody built this fragmentation on purpose. It is simply what happens when a field grows only through schools. But a collection of schools, however excellent each one may be, does not add up to a profession.
How other fields solved it
We are not the first to stand here. Every serious profession once stood at exactly this point.
Medicine is full of specialities, schools of thought and rival approaches, yet doctors belong to medical associations that hold a shared code of ethics above them all. Psychology contains traditions that disagree fundamentally (psychodynamic, behavioural, systemic, humanistic), yet psychological societies give them one professional home, one code, one voice towards society. Coaching, the field whose story most resembles ours, is living through this maturation right now: training schools continue to compete and differentiate, while professional federations build the standards, the accreditation and the research base.
Notice the pattern. In none of these fields did the schools disappear. The associations did not replace them; they completed them. Schools answer the question “Where do I train?” Associations answer a different question: “What do we owe one another, and what do we owe society?”
NLP has world-class answers to the first question. The second is the one we have left open.
What if?
So here is my what if: not as a criticism of anyone, but as an invitation to everyone.
What if the next chapter of NLP in Greece were not another school, but a shared professional home? A place where a practitioner from INLPTA, one from ABNLP and one from any honest tradition stand together as colleagues, keeping their traditions, their trainers and their loyalties, while committing together to a public code of ethics, a standard of professionalism, and one voice that tells Greek society: this is what a serious NLP professional looks like.
That is exactly what ANLP was built to be. Not another certifying body. Not a competitor to anyone’s diplomas. An independent professional association, with a Code of Ethics, professional standards, published research, Rapport magazine, and a community in dozens of countries, where every honest practitioner is welcome, whichever door they first came in through.
I did not join ANLP instead of my tradition. I joined on behalf of my profession. That distinction is the whole point.
A symbol, not just an event
And because a vision needs a place where people can see each other’s faces, let me name mine.
I dream of an ANLP Greece Festival, and it is already in the works: a day when practitioners from every school in Greece gather in one room. Not to argue about which tradition is the most authentic. To present case studies. To share research. So that a practitioner from one tradition can see, perhaps for the first time, how a colleague from another one really works. To show our clients, our critics and ourselves that NLP in Greece is not scattered islands; it is an archipelago discovering that, under the water, it was always one landscape.
Not an event. A symbol. The first photograph of a profession.
The door is open
If anything in this series spoke to you, the way in could not be simpler. You can explore ANLP membership, from whichever school you trained in, at anlp.org/become-a-member. Explore it from the inside. Read Rapport. Look at the research. Meet the international community. See the Code of Ethics and the professional framework for yourself. Then decide, fully informed, whether this is your professional home.
Where this begins
Four articles ago, I asked you where you see your NLP journey taking you in five years. Let me now ask the bigger version of that question.
Imagine an NLP profession where collaboration becomes stronger than competition.
Where our differences remain, and stop dividing us. Where a new practitioner certified today inherits not an archipelago of islands, but a profession with a home.
No organisation can build that for us. No school can, and no association either, not on its own.
Perhaps this journey begins with each one of us.
I have chosen where I stand. The door is open, and I am holding it.
No obligation. No small print. Just an open door. If you would like to talk it through, get in touch with us.
Nikolas Fragkias is a psychologist, behavioural analyst and executive coach, ANLP International Ambassador and INLPTA National Coordinator for Greece.